Psychiatr. Pol. 2016; 50(5): 1039–1052

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/45368

Natalia Ciesielska, Remigiusz Sokołowski, Ewelina Mazur,
Marta Podhorecka, Anna Polak-Szabela, Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska


Czy test Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) może być skuteczniejszy od powszechnie stosowanego Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) w wykrywaniu łagodnych zaburzeń funkcji poznawczych u osób po 60. roku życia? Metaanaliza

Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis

Introduction. Screening tests play a crucial role in dementia diagnostics, thus they should be very sensitive for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) assessment. Nowadays, the MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) is the most commonly used scale in cognitive function evaluation, albeit it is claimed to be imprecise for MCI detection. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), was created as an alternative method for MMSE.
Aim. MoCA vs. MMSE credibility assessment in detecting MCI, while taking into consideration the sensitivity and specificity by cut-off points.
Material and methods. A systematic literature search was carried out by the authors using EBSCO host Web, Wiley Online Library, Springer Link, Science Direct and Medline databases. The following medical subject headings were used in the search: mild cognitive impairment, mini-mental state examination, Montreal cognitive assessment, diagnostics value. Papers which met inclusion and exclusion criteria were chosen to be included in this review. At the end, for the evaluation of MoCA 20, and MMSE 13 studies were qualified. Research credibility was established by computing weighted arithmetic mean, where weight is defined as population for which the result of sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off point was achieved. The cut-offs are shown as ROC curve and accuracy of diagnosis for MoCA and MMSE was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC).
Results. ROC curve analysis for MoCA demonstrated that MCI best detection can be achieved with a cut-off point of 24/25 (n = 9350, the sensitivity of 80.48% and specificity of 81.19%). AUC was 0.846 (95% CI 0.823–0.868). For MMSE, it turned out that more important cut-off was of 27/28 (n = 882, 66.34% sensitivity and specificity of 72.94%). AUC was 0.736 (95% CI 0.718–0.767).
Conclusions. MoCA test better meets the criteria for screening tests for the detection of MCI among patients over 60 years of age than MMSE.

ISSN 0033-2674 (PRINT)

ISSN 2391-5854 (ONLINE)

Psychiatria Polska
is an Open Access journal:
Creative Commons: CC-BY

Zadanie finansowane
w ramach umowy
nr 739/P-DUN/2018
ze środków MNiSW
na działalność
upowszechniającą naukę

KRW PTP dziękuje 
firmie PPL – Koral – J.Koral sp.j.
za wsparcie finansowe 
udzielone w 2020 roku

Inne strony PTP:
Other PTP websites:



Psychiatria Polska
Thomson Reuters Master List
Science Citation Index Expanded
Journal Citation Reports
(Impact Factor 1,596)

Medline/Index Medicus
MNiSW (100 pkt)
CiteScore 2,4
(SJR 0,414; SNIP 0,707)
EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
Index Copernicus
Erih Plus, Cochrane Library

We recommend:

Pharmacological Reports


KONTAKT Z REDAKCJĄ - wyłącznie e-mail: redakcja@psychiatriapolska.pl 

Biuro KRW PTP - prenumeraty, faktury - wyłącznie e-mail: biuro@krwptp.pl